STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2388

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    S.B. No. 3332

       S.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi

President of the Senate

Thirty-Second State Legislature

Regular Session of 2024

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection, to which was referred S.B. No. 3332 entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO EVICTION MEDIATION,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to:

 

     (1)  Temporarily:

 

          (A)  Extend the period for a notice of termination of a rental agreement, beginning November 1, 2024;

 

          (B)  Require landlords to engage in mediation and delay filing an action for summary possession if a tenant schedules or attempts to schedule mediation; and

 

          (C)  Require landlords to provide specific information in the ten‑calendar-day notice to tenants; and

 

     (2)  Make an appropriation.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from The Judiciary; Mediation Center of the Pacific, Inc.; Catholic Charities Hawaiʻi; Hawaiʻi State Coalition Against Domestic Violence; Kuʻikahi Mediation Center; Palehua Townhouse Association; Hawaiʻi Housing Affordability Coalition; Hawaii Disability Rights Center; Kauai Economic Opportunity, Inc.; and nine individuals.

 

     Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Department of Human Services, Hawaii Appleseed Center for Law and Economic Justice, and Hawaiʻi Association of REALTORS.

 

     Your Committee finds that many Hawaii residents continue to face challenges paying their rent.  Your Committee further finds that Act 57, Session Laws of Hawaii 2021 (Act 57), encouraged communication and facilitated mediation between landlords and tenants to help encourage collaborative solutions and reduce evictions when possible.  Your Committee finds that although the provisions of Act 57 have since expired, the pre-litigation mediation program's success warrants the readoption of its most effective provisions.  Therefore, this measure would reimplement certain provisions of Act 57 and encourage tenants and landlords to engage in early mediation.

 

     Notwithstanding, your Committee notes that a separate measure, S.B. No. 3331 (2024), which was concurrently heard by your Committee, is a substantially similar measure that also encourages mediation between landlords and tenants.  Your Committee concludes that the language in S.B. No. 3331 (2024), is preferable, as it resolves the potential subject-title concerns raised by the Department of Attorney General with respect to the provisions of this measure in its current form.  Your Committee also acknowledges the separate concerns raised in testimony with respect to various provisions of S.B. No. 3331 (2024), regarding the lack of a rent relief program with respect to S.B. No. 3332.  Therefore, amendments to this measure are necessary to address these various issues.

 

     Accordingly, your Committee has amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Deleting its contents and inserting the contents of S.B. No. 3331 (2024), a substantially similar measure, and further amending the measure to:

 

          (A)  Codify the pre-litigation mediation program into chapter 521, Hawaii Revised Statutes;

 

          (B)  Amend the definition of "final eviction moratorium";

 

          (C)  Clarify that the Governor may continue the eviction moratorium until the termination or expiration of any emergency proclamation; and

 

          (D)  Delete language that would have allowed a landlord to request all costs incurred during the pre-litigation mediation process if a tenant defaults on a mediated agreement or fails to attend a scheduled mediation;

 

     (2)  Inserting language to establish an emergency rent relief program available to participants in pre-litigation mediation and appropriating funds accordingly;

 

     (3)  Inserting language to specify that this measure shall not be applied so as to impair any contract in a manner that violates either the Hawaii State Constitution or the United States Constitution;

 

     (4)  Amending section 1 to reflect its amended purpose;

 

     (5)  Inserting an effective date of July 1, 2040, to encourage further discussion; and

 

     (6)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 3332, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 3332, S.D. 1, and be referred to your Committees on Ways and Means and Judiciary.

 


 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection,

 

 

 

________________________________

JARRETT KEOHOKALOLE, Chair