STAND. COM. REP. NO. 2427

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    S.B. No. 2514

       S.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Ronald D. Kouchi

President of the Senate

Thirty-Second State Legislature

Regular Session of 2024

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committee on Judiciary, to which was referred S.B. No. 2514 entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO ATTORNEYS,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to strengthen the State's tax laws by requiring attorneys who are applying for a pro hac vice appearance in the State's courts to provide:

 

     (1)  Evidence of local counsel's Hawaiʻi business registration;

 

     (2)  The applicant's Hawaiʻi general excise tax license number;

 

     (3)  An affirmation that both the applicant and local counsel will pay all state income tax due for Hawaiʻi business activities; and

 

     (4)  All other information or documentation required by the rules of the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Hawaii Association of Public Accountants and three individuals.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from The Judiciary.

 

     Your Committee received comments on this measure from the Tax Foundation of Hawaii.

 

     Your Committee finds that out-of-state attorneys who practice in the State's courts pro hac vice may be unaware that they owe the State general excise tax.  Unlike the general excise tax in most states, Hawaiʻi's tax applies to both gross rental income and gross service income.  This measure will help inform attorneys of their state tax obligations by amending the process by which out-of-state attorneys are admitted to practice law in the State's courts.

 

     Your Committee notes that the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court has begun to address the issue of informing pro hac vice attorneys of their state tax obligations by proposing rule changes.

 

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Inserting an effective date of April 15, 2112, to encourage further discussion; and

 

     (2)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 2514, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 2514, S.D. 1, and be referred to your Committee on Ways and Means.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary,

 

 

 

________________________________

KARL RHOADS, Chair