STAND. COM. REP. NO. 381-06

Honolulu, Hawaii

, 2006

RE: H.B. No. 2204

H.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Calvin K.Y. Say

Speaker, House of Representatives

Twenty-Third State Legislature

Regular Session of 2006

State of Hawaii

Sir:

Your Committee on Hawaiian Affairs, to which was referred H.B. No. 2204 entitled:

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO THE OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS,"

begs leave to report as follows:

The purpose of this bill is to further the Legislature’s attempt to determine the pro rata portion of the public land trust to be transferred to, managed, and administered by the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) for the betterment of the conditions of native Hawaiians pursuant to Article XII, Section 6 of the Hawaii Constitution. Specifically, this bill establishes and appropriates an unspecified sum of interim revenue to be expended by OHA each fiscal year for the betterment of the conditions of native Hawaiians.

Alu Like and Papa Ola Lokahi testified in support of this measure. OHA, the Department of the Attorney General (AG), Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation, and Native Hawaiian Hospitality Association supported a yet to be determined settlement between the State and OHA on the amount OHA is entitled to as its pro rata portion of revenues from the public land trust. A concerned individual testified in opposition.

In Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. Yamasaki, 69 Haw. 154, 737 P.2d 446 (1987), the Hawaii Supreme Court determined that the issue of what constitutes OHA's pro rata portion of all the funds derived from the public land trust is a political question. The Supreme Court stated that it could not find any "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" that could be used to resolve the issue. Id., at 175, 737 P.2d at 459. Accordingly, the Supreme Court declined to rule upon the substance of the case, holding that the issues presented were "of a peculiarly political nature and therefore not meet for judicial determination." Id.

Fourteen years later, the Hawaii Supreme Court reaffirmed its holding in Yamasaki in Office of Hawaiian Affairs vs. State of Hawai'i, 96 Haw. 388, 31 P.3d 901 (2001). In that case, the Supreme Court stated in pertinent part:

[T]he State's obligation to native Hawaiians is firmly established in our constitution. How the State satisfies that constitutional obligation requires policy decisions that are primarily within the authority and expertise of the legislative branch. As such, it is incumbent upon the legislature to enact legislation that qgives effect to the right of native Hawaiians to benefit from the ceded lands trust.

Id. at 401, 31 P.3d at 914 (emphasis in original). In making this statement, the Supreme Court relied upon Article XVI, Section 7 of the Hawaii Constitution, which reads:

Any trust provisions which the Congress shall impose, upon the admission of this State, in respect of the lands patented to the State by the United States or the proceeds and income therefrom, shall be complied with by appropriate legislation. Such legislation shall not diminish or limit the benefits of native Hawaiians under Section 4 of Article XII.

As stated earlier, the purpose of this measure is to further the Legislature’s constitutional obligation to implement its constitutional obligation to define OHA's pro rata portion of funds derived from the public land trust. As a preliminary matter, it should be noted that in recent years, the issue of whether the completion of an inventory of lands comprising the public land trust is necessary to determine OHA's pro rata portion has been debated. It is the understanding of your Committee, however, that no inventory is necessary, based on the testimonies of representatives from OHA and AG on this measure.

Your Committee has amended this bill by:

(1) Inserting a findings and purpose section;

(2) Specifying that the income and proceeds from the pro rata portion of the public land trust for expenditure by the OHA for each fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2005-2006 shall be $15,100,000;

(3) Appropriating $17,500,000 for fiscal year 2005-2006, to pay OHA receipts from the use of lands within the public land trust that should have been transferred, but were not transferred previously to OHA between July 1, 2001, and June 30, 2005;

(4) Requiring the Department of Land and Natural Resources to account for receipts generated from the public land trust, and appropriating $250,000 for that purpose;

(5) Specifying that this measure will not affect the claims of native Hawaiians to the income and proceeds of a pro rata portion of the public land trust; and

(6) Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for style, clarity, and consistency.

Section 2 ___ specifies that beginning in fiscal year 2005-2006, and until further legislative action is taken, the income and proceeds from the pro rata portion of the public land trust for expenditure by OHA pursuant to Article XII, Section 6 of the Hawaii Constitution shall be $15,100,000 per fiscal year. This amount shall be transferred from various state departments and agencies to OHA in four equal quarterly installments via voucher payments. According to the AG:

The annual $15.1 million share . . . for annual transfer to OHA is based on the sums actually transferred during these four fiscal years, the sums of analogous receipts that could have been transferred from the health and housing corporations and the University, the upward trend of these receipts over the last four years, and negotiation and fairness considerations.

See Testimony of the AG to the House Committee on Hawaiian Affairs, dated February 1, 2006, p. 3. The AG supplemented his written testimony at the hearing by explaining that the $15,100,000 also includes certain ancillary receipts from the state airports.In addition, even though airports receipts themselves cannot be used to pay the amount, the Attorney General also testified that the $15,100,000 included certain ancillary receipts from the airports. See Testimony of the AG, p. 2.

The approximate amount of funding actually transferred to OHA pursuant to Executive Order No. 03-03 and Act 34, Session Laws of Hawaii 2003, was as follows:

FYs 2002-2003 2004 2005

DAGS State Parking Revolving Fund $32,757 $22,896 $23,730

DOA Agricultural Park Special Fund

General Fund

$74,921 $46,006 $113,505

DBED&T Foreign Trade Zone Special

Fund

HCDA Revolving Fund

NELHA Special Fund

$357,043 $230,090 $253,045

DOE Use of School Facilities $50,966 $48,400 $45,098

Special Fund

DLNR Boating Special Fund

Special Land & Development Fund

State Parks Special Fund

Beach Restoration Special Fund

General Fund

$2,554,338 $2,274,483 $2,774,768

DOT Harbors Special Fund $9,049,700 $6,480,000 $6,866,384

Act 34, SLH 2002 $2,041,852 _________ ________

General Fund

Annual Totals $14,161,577 $9,101,875 $10,076,530

The approximate amounts of "analogous" ceded land receipts wereas as follows:

FYs 2002-2003 2004 2005

Hawaii Health Systems Corporation $665,687 $471,650 Unverified

Hilo Medical, Kula Hospital,

Samuel Mahelona

Non-Patient Food Sales

Catering Revenue

Parking Revenue

Data processing Services Revenue

Medical Records Abstract Sales

Non-Patient Room Rentals

Telephone & Telegraph Revenue

Restricted and Non-Restricted

Contributions

Employee Housing Rent Revenue

Clinical Rent Revenue

Other Space Rental

University of Hawaii $1,293,852 $1,182,121 Unverified

Manoa and Hilo Campuses

Parking

Faculty Housing

Non-Student Housing Rentals,

including food and vending

machine,telephone

commissions/collections

Hilo Bookstore – logo products,

sundries but not books or

school supplies

Other Revenue

HCDCH Housing $80,626 $40,091 $32,625

Public School Faculty

Housing Rentals

Public Rental Housing

Laundromat/Vending

Machine Receipts

Public Rental Housing

Antennae Rental Receipts

___________ ___________ _________

Annual Totals $2,040,165 $1,693,862 Unverified

 

The approximate amounts of ancillary receipts from the state airports were as follows:

DOT Ancillary Airports Receipts From Ceded Lands

FYs 2002-2003 2004 2005

HIA Terminal Rental Revenue $2,598,460 $1,290,018 $1,068,268

HIA Terminal Concession Revenue $857,152 $503,754 $525,671

Non-HIA Aeronautical Revenue $1,158,094 $671,564 $712,015

Non-HIA Concession/Other $18,241,417 $ 9,655,042 $10,159,033

Terminal Revenue

Annual Total Receipts $22,855,123 $12,120,378 $12,464,987

20% Share $4,571,025 $2,424,076 $2,492,997

Section 4 appropriates the sum of $17,500,000 to OHA in fiscal year 2005-2006. This one-time appropriation

. . . raise[s] the [amount] of ceded land receipts actually transferred to OHA during the fiscal years 2002 through 2005. The one-time appropriation of general funds is roughly equivalent to analogous rent-type receipts for the use of ceded lands collected by the Hawaii Health Systems Corporation, the Housing and Community Development Corporation of Hawaii, and the University of Hawaii, etc. during the relevant period which were not paid for legal reasons, interest, and negotiation and fairness considerations.

Id. at 4. In other words, this appropriation represents a "catch-up" of amounts that were underpaid during the specified time period.

Section 5 requires the DLNR to provide an annual accounting of revenues derived from the public land trust. At the present time, no single state department or agency is responsible for compiling such data. A single accounting will provide the Legislature, OHA, the general public, and even the State administration, with a clearer financial picture of the public land trust.

 

 

As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Hawaiian Affairs that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2204, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2204, H.D. 1, and be referred to the Committee on Finance.

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Hawaiian Affairs,

 

____________________________

SCOTT K. SAIKI, Chair