CHAPTER 804
BAIL; BOND TO KEEP THE PEACE
Part I. Bail; Recognizance
Section
804-1 Bail defined
804-2 Unclaimed bail money
804-3 Bailable offenses
804-4 When a matter of right
804-5 By whom allowed
804-6 Bail bond after conviction
804-7 Release after bail
804-7.1 Conditions of release on bail, recognizance, or
supervised release
804-7.2 Violations of conditions of release on bail,
recognizance, or supervised release
804-7.3 Sanctions for violation of conditions of release on
bail, recognizance, or supervised release
804-7.4 General conditions of release on bail
804-7.5 Right to a prompt hearing; release or detention
804-8 No bail where wounding may terminate in death
804-9 Amount
804-9.5 Unsecured bail
804-10 Repealed
804-10.5 Sureties; qualification
804-11 One surety sufficient; when
804-11.5 Cash, credit and debit card authorization, stocks,
bonds, or real property as security for bail
804-12 Bond for minor
804-13 Insufficient bail
804-14 Discharge of sureties
804-15 Recognizance
804-16 Bail bond, etc., deposited where
804-17 Prompt appearance and response; default
804-18 Witness, summary process for
804-19 Times for appearance
Part II. Bond to Keep the Peace
804-31 Offense against complainant, arrest
804-32 Bond pending trial and upon appeal
804-33 Trial; bond protecting complainant
804-34 Bond not executed
804-35 Bond protecting others
804-36 Term and renewal of bond
804-37 Offense in presence of district judge
804-38 Offense against other than complainant; arrest
804-39 Bond in addition to conviction
804-40 Suit on bond
804-41 Discharge of surety
Part III. Forfeiture
804-51 Procedure
Part IV. Miscellaneous Provisions
804-61 Repealed
804-62 Limit of compensation; penalty
Note
As to procedural statutes superseded by the rules of court, see note preceding Title 32.
Cross References
Arrest warrants arising from outstanding traffic warrants, see §§353-66.5 and 604-7.2.
Case Notes
Notice of bail forfeiture judgment that is required under §804-51 was properly provided to the respective surety; given the proper notice to the surety, the circuit court correctly ruled that the motions filed by appellant insurance company to set aside bail forfeiture judgments were untimely and that the court lacked authority with regard to these motions. 139 H. 147 (App.), 384 P.3d 923 (2016).