CHAPTER 266
HARBORS
Part I. Generally
Section
266-1 Department of transportation; harbors; jurisdiction
266-1.5 Honolulu harbor Piers 1 and 2; jurisdiction
266-1.6 Hana harbor; jurisdiction
266-2 Powers and duties of department
266-2.2 Exemption from conservation district permitting and
site plan approval requirements
266-2.3 Repealed
266-2.5 Outdoor lighting
266-3 Rules
266-4 Limitation of powers
266-4.5 Disposition of public land; reservation of right of
way
266-5 Repealed
266-6 Expenditures
266-7 Department; duties
266-8 to 12 Repealed
266-13 Dockage
266-14 Demurrage, lien, foreclosure
266-15, 16 Repealed
266-17 Rates, how fixed
266-18 Repealed
266-19 Creation of harbor special fund; disposition of
harbor special fund
266-19.5 Private financing of harbor improvements
266-20 to 21.3 Repealed
266-21.4 Marine inspections
266‑21.5 Biosecurity, inspection, and cargo support
facilities
266-22 Repealed
266-23 Acceptance of gifts
266-24 Enforcement
266-24.1 Arrest or citation
266-24.2 Vessels or property taken into legal custody;
unauthorized control
266-25 Violation of rules; penalty
266-26 Responsibility of vessel owner; evidence of
unauthorized mooring
266-27 Mooring of unauthorized vessel in state harbors;
impoundment and disposal proceedings
266-28 Fines arising from environmental protection
and maritime transportation security violations
266-29 State harbors civil violations system;
authorization
266-30 General administrative penalties
266-31 Restriction of use of facilities
Part II. Special Facility Projects
266-51 Definitions
266-52 Powers
266-53 Findings and determination for special facility leases
266-54 Special facility lease
266-55 Special facility revenue bonds
266-56 Repealed
Note
Large capacity ferry vessel requirements. L Sp 2007 2d, c 2.
Case Notes
Although this chapter did not explicitly confer authority over the Kewalo basin harbor on the Hawaii community development authority (HCDA), it was undisputed that (1) the legislature conveyed title to the fast and submerged lands within an area that includes the harbor to HCDA; (2) HCDA was given the mandate to redevelop the area that includes the harbor; and (3) HCDA was given broad rulemaking powers over its projects and properties to implement its mandate pursuant to §§206E-33 and 206E-4(5); thus, circuit court did not err by failing to find that the department of transportation had exclusive jurisdiction over harbor. 124 H. 313 (App.), 243 P.3d 273 (2010).